Skip to content

Conversation

@aditya520
Copy link
Member

Summary

Rationale

How has this been tested?

  • Current tests cover my changes
  • Added new tests
  • Manually tested the code

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 4, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
component-library Ready Ready Preview Comment Sep 8, 2025 2:20pm
developer-hub Ready Ready Preview Comment Sep 8, 2025 2:20pm
5 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference Skipped Skipped Sep 8, 2025 2:20pm
entropy-explorer Skipped Skipped Sep 8, 2025 2:20pm
insights Skipped Skipped Sep 8, 2025 2:20pm
proposals Skipped Skipped Sep 8, 2025 2:20pm
staking Skipped Skipped Sep 8, 2025 2:20pm

Copy link
Collaborator

@cprussin cprussin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM, most important thing to change before you merge is to make sure you don't have a default case anywhere that you're using the sum types pattern as it breaks exhaustivity checks, and that's one of the main reasons to use that pattern in the first place

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
"use client";
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not something you need to worry about @aditya520 but just a note to self, we should probably look into using async server components from markdown to see if it's possible cc @alexcambose

@aditya520 aditya520 marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2025 14:16
@aditya520 aditya520 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2025 14:16
@aditya520 aditya520 merged commit 57002c5 into main Sep 8, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@aditya520 aditya520 deleted the chore(dev-docs)-entropy-edits branch September 8, 2025 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants